loading
  • Trang chủ
  • Sách, tuyển tập
  • Evaluation of 2-column agglutination versus conventional tube technique for antibody screening / Abou Jabal, A.;Shubeilat, T.;Hajjiri, F.
Sách, tuyển tập Tài liệu điện tử

Evaluation of 2-column agglutination versus conventional tube technique for antibody screening / Abou Jabal, A.;Shubeilat, T.;Hajjiri, F.

Tác giả : Abou Jabal, A.;Shubeilat, T.;Hajjiri, F.

Năm xuất bản : 2003

Chủ đề : 1. Antibodies. 2. Case-Control Studies. 3. Cost-Benefit Analysis. 4. Hemagglutination Tests. 5. Isoantibodies. 6. Mass Screening. 7. Papain. 8. Rho[D] Immune Globulin. 9. Sensitivity and Specificity.

Chia sẻ

Thông tin chi tiết

Tóm tắt :

407-412 The study aimed to determine the specificity and sensitivity of the Ortho BioVue two-column agglutination system for the detection of low concentrations of clinically significant antibodies in serum. The BioVue system was compared with the conventional tube technique [LISS-Coombs indirect antiglobulin test], and the two-stage Papenzyme test was used to resolve discrepancies between the two methods. We tested 3000 serum samples from randomly selected patients at King Hussein Medical Centre. Both the antibody screening and identification gave negative results in 2952 patients and positive results in 48 patients. We found the BioVue system to be the more sensitive technique. However, if papain enzyme-treated cells were included in the conventional tube technique when applied to antibody screening and identification, both methods would be of comparable sensitivity
Chia sẻ


Hiển thị MARC

 Thông tin dữ liệu nguồn

 Thư viện  Ký hiệu xếp giá  Dữ liệu nguồn
Tổ chức y tế thế giới
https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/119291